Google: We Don't Have A Concept Of Toxic Domains

Google's John Mueller said on Twitter "we don't have a concept of toxic domains." It was in a reply about a third-party SEO tool saying some of the links to his site are low quality and maybe toxic. 谷歌的約翰·穆勒（John Mueller）在推特上說：“我們沒有有毒域名的概念。” 有人在答復(fù)第三方SEO工具時說，指向他網(wǎng)站的某些鏈接質(zhì)量低下，甚至有毒。

Google said previously most site do not have toxic links. So I guess there is some sort of "concept" around a toxic link but I doubt Google classifies those links internally as toxic. 谷歌此前表示，大多數(shù)網(wǎng)站沒有有害鏈接。因此，我猜想有毒鏈接周圍存在某種“概念”，但我懷疑Google在內(nèi)部將這些鏈接歸類為有毒鏈接。

PageRank by definition gives different weights to links based on the reputation of those links. But could those weights be negative? I doubt it, not since Penguin 4.0. 根據(jù)定義，PageRank根據(jù)這些鏈接的信譽(yù)為鏈接賦予不同的權(quán)重。但是這些權(quán)重是否為負(fù)？我對此表示懷疑，自企鵝4.0之后就沒有。

In any event, sure, I think with manual actions, some links can be "toxic" in terms of hurting a site from ranking. But with Penguin 4.0, Google now algorithmically just ignores bad links to your site. 當(dāng)然，無論如何，我認(rèn)為通過手動操作，某些鏈接在損害網(wǎng)站排名方面可能是“有毒的”。但是使用Penguin 4.0，Google現(xiàn)在從算法上只會忽略指向您網(wǎng)站的錯誤鏈接。

Here are those tweets:

Forum discussion at Twitter.